California Proposition 65

April 1, 2021 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

Two Chemicals Added to California Proposition 65 Substances List

CA Prop 65 Now Includes Molybdenum and Indium Tin Oxide

prop-65California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has updated the list of substances regulated under the state’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65).

Effective March 19, 2021, the following two substances have been added to the list of chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer:

  • Molybdenum Trioxide (CAS No. 1313-27-5)
  • Indium Tin Oxide (CAS No. 50926-11-9)

Molybdenum trioxide is used to manufacture molybdenum metal, which serves as an additive to steel and corrosion-resistant alloys.

Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) is an optoelectronic material that is widely used across multiple industries, including but not limited the following common applications:

  • Aircraft windshield defrosting films
  • Antireflection coatings
  • Architectural windows
  • Bragg reflectors for VCSEL lasers
  • Electronic ink applications
  • Electrowetting on dielectrics
  • Flat-panel displays
  • Gas sensors
  • Glass doors of supermarket freezers
  • Infrared-reflecting coatings
  • IR reflectors for low-e window panes
  • Liquid crystal displays
  • OLED displays
  • Optical coatings
  • Plasma displays
  • Polymer-based electronics
  • Smart windows
  • Sodium vapor lamp glasses
  • Thin film photovoltaics
  • Thin film strain gauges in gas turbines, jet engines, and rocket engines
  • Touch panels
  • Transparent conductive coatings

OEHHA’s notice about the two substance additions can be found online.

Affected companies are required to inform Californians about exposure to substances on the CA Prop 65 chemicals list, either through their products or at their business locations, before the potential exposure takes place. Penalties for being found in violation of CA Prop 65 can be as high as $2,500 per violation (per exposed person), per day.

GreenSoft Collects Chemical Information for CA Prop 65 Compliance for You

As part of our California Proposition 65 Data Services, we will collect substance data from your suppliers on your behalf, and check it against the list of chemicals regulated under CA Prop 65 using our GreenData Manager compliance software.

This will provide you with the data you need to comply with California Proposition 65 warning label requirements, while freeing up your time to focus on making and selling your products. Contact us to learn more.

Related Posts

U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)

March 30, 2021 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

Analyzing the Impact of New TSCA Substance Restrictions

New TSCA rules published by EPA affect many manufacturers for the first time

tscaThe GreenSoft Technology team has performed an impact analysis to see exactly how big of a risk the new US Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) substance restrictions create for electronics manufacturers.

The new rules from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in January ban or restrict five persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) substances.

Unlike prior actions taken by the EPA under the TSCA, which largely applied only to the production, processing, and importing of chemicals, these new rules include restrictions on substances present in articles.

The restriction on substances present in articles means that many manufacturers are being impacted by the TSCA for the first time. Two of the five substances, PIP 3:1 and DecaBDE, are commonly used in electronic equipment. As such, the new TSCA restrictions are expected to cause significant disruptions in many electronics manufacturers’ existing supply chains.

To understand the full impact on the electronics industry, read our article on LinkedIn here.

GreenSoft Technology can help with TSCA compliance

GreenSoft Technology helps companies with TSCA compliance by performing data collection, data validation, substance calculations and report generation as part of our TSCA data services.

Learn more about how our TSCA data services can help your company with the US TSCA compliance by contacting us.

Related Posts

U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)

March 11, 2021 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

EPA Extends Deadline for New TSCA PBT Restriction Impacting Electronics Producers

180-Day No Action Assurance for Restrictions on PIP (3:1)

tscaOn January 6 the Untied States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) passed final rules banning or restricting five persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) substances, most with only 60 days’ notice.

Unlike prior actions taken by the EPA under the US Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), which largely applied only to the production, processing, and importing of chemicals, these new rules include restrictions on substances present in products (articles).

The new TSCA restrictions are:

Of the above five substances addressed in the recent final rules, one specific substance, Isopropylated Phosphate (3:1) (PIP 3:1), has been found to be commonly used in electronic equipment.

The electronics industry was alarmed when the EPA provided only 60 days to eliminate this substance from their supply chains, and immediately requested a delay in implementation or enforcement leading up to the March 8 deadline.

On March 8, 2021, in response to industry requests, the EPA announced a 180-day No Action Assurance for processing and distributing in commerce of PIP (3:1) for use in articles, including in PIP (3:1)-containing articles. This means companies can continue to import, distribute, and process articles containing PIP 3:1 until September 4, 2021. However, this guarantee of non-enforcement only applies to PIP 3:1 for use in or contained in articles, and does not apply to any other users of PIP 3:1 or the other four restricted PBT compounds listed above.

submit-commentThe EPA has also opened a new 60-day comment period, allowing companies and other industry stakeholders to provide comments on the PBT restrictions. Companies who feel more than 180 days is needed to address PIP 3:1 in their products are encouraged to provide a comment to the EPA.

While the 180-day delay in enforcement of the PIP 3:1 restriction in articles provides some immediate relief, companies should begin collecting data on the presence of all five PBT substances in their products as soon as possible. The clock is ticking to confirm compliance, and allow for PIP 3:1 to be eliminated from the products prior to the September 4 deadline if found to be present in any parts or materials of the product.

GreenSoft Technology can help with TSCA PBT compliance

The EPA has put the industry on notice that TSCA is no longer targeting chemicals themselves; the regulation is now placing restrictions on articles. Companies need to track EPA/TSCA activity and ensure they have the data needed to ensure compliance.

GreenSoft Technology helps manage this process for companies, by performing data collection, data validation, substance calculations and report generation as part of our TSCA PBT data services. GreenSoft’s industry-proven data collection and validation process will ensure you have all the data needed to demonstrate full compliance with EPA PBT restrictions and prohibitions.

Learn more about how our TSCA PBT data services can help your company with US TSCA compliance by contacting us.

Related Posts

Webinar

February 17, 2021 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

6 Months Into SCIP: Lessons Learned Webinar

Free, Educational SCIP Database Webinar Signups Happening Now!

SCIP-Lessons-LearnedWe are now approaching six months since the EU SCIP Database online portal was launched by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

In that time, affected companies and industry service providers have worked through various struggles as they’ve started collecting, preparing and submitting data to the SCIP Database portal.

In this webinar, GreenSoft Technology will take you through the lessons we’ve learned to answer your common questions, including:

  • How to create an account for the SCIP Database portal
  • How to generate an S2S Key
  • Best practices for grouping products into one SCIP notification
  • Complying with “Once-an-Article” requirements when making SCIP notifications
  • Common supplier SCIP data gaps and how to address them
  • What information will be available to the public
  • Common mistakes to avoid

Plus, you’ll get a chance to ask your own questions to Randy Flinders, Compliance Specialist for GreenSoft Technology, for Randy to answer live during the webinar.

Don’t miss out on this great opportunity to learn more about the SCIP Database and avoid common pitfalls that others have made. Register now to save your spot!

Thursday, April 29

Two session times available:

Related Posts

EU RoHS

February 4, 2021 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

Assessment Project Started for Commonly Used EU RoHS Exemptions

February 4, 2021Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

EU RoHS Annex III and IV Exemptions To Be Studied and Assessed

eu-rohsThe Öko-Institut e.V. Institute for Applied Ecology has launched two new projects on behalf of the European Commission to assess certain EU RoHS Exemptions.

The Pack 22 project, launched in December 2020, will evaluate sixteen industry requests for renewal of the following nine exemptions listed in Annex III of the EU RoHS Directive, per Article 5(1)(b) of EU RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU:

•   Exemption 6(a)/6(a)-I for lead as an alloying element in steel for machining purposes and in galvanised steel containing up to 0,35 % lead by weight (2 requests, submitted on 17 and 20 January 2020);

•   Exemption 6(b)/6(b)-I for lead as an alloying element in aluminium containing up to 0,4 % lead by weight, provided it stems from lead-bearing aluminium scrap recycling (2 request, submitted on 9 December 2019 and 17 January 2020);

•   Exemption 6(b)-II for lead as an alloying element in aluminium for machining purposes with a lead content up to 0,4 % by weight (1 request, submitted on 8 November 2019);

•   Exemption 6(c) for copper alloy containing up to 4 % lead by weight (2 requests, submitted on 3 and 15 January 2020);

•   Exemption 7(a) for lead in high melting temperature type solders (i.e. lead-based alloys containing 85 % by weight or more lead) (2 requests, submitted on 6 and 25 January 2020);

•   Exemption 7(c)-I for electrical and electronic components containing lead in a glass or ceramic other than dielectric ceramic in capacitors, e.g. piezoelectronic devices, or in a glass or ceramic matrix compound (6 requests, submitted on 2, 3, 6, 17, 19 and 20 January 2020);

•   Exemption 7(c)-II for lead in dielectric ceramic in capacitors for a rated voltage of 125 V AC or 250 V DC or higher (1 request, submitted on 19 January 2020).

The Pack 24 project, launched in January 2021, will evaluate the following seven exemptions:

  • Annex III, Exemption 18(b): Lead as activator in the fluorescent powder (1 % lead by weight or less) of discharge lamps when used as sun tanning lamps containing phosphors such as BSP.
  • Annex III, Exemptions 18(b)-I: Lead as activator in the fluorescent powder (1 % lead by weight or less) of discharge lamps containing phosphors such as BSP when used in medical phototherapy equipment.
  • Annex III, Exemption 24: Lead in solders for the soldering to machined through hole discoidal and planar array ceramic multilayer capacitors.
  • Annex III, Exemption 29: Lead bound in crystal glass as defined in Annex I (Categories 1, 2, 3 and 4) of Council Directive 69/493/EEC.
  • Annex III, Exemption 32: Lead oxide in seal frit used for making window assemblies for Argon and Krypton laser tubes.
  • Annex III, Exemption 34: Lead in cermet-based trimmer potentiometer elements.
  • Annex IV, Exemption 34: Lead as an activator in the fluorescent powder of discharge lamps when used for extracorporeal photopheresis lamps containing BSP (BaSi2O5:Pb) phosphors.”

The exemptions in both packs will be assessed to determine why the restricted substance is currently required or used, if a suitable substitute exists, and if the elimination or substitution of the restricted substances is technically or scientifically possible.

The Pack 22 and Pack 24 projects will also identify and assess the socio-economic impacts of substitution, the volume of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) concerned placed on the EU market annually, and the impact of employment in the EEE concerned industry and related to upstream and downstream supply chains in the EU.

Once the Öko-Institut e.V. Institute for Applied Ecology completes the Pack 22 and Pack 24 reviews, they will issue a report to the EU Commission which will contain recommendations on whether the exemptions should be renewed, and, if they are renewed, whether any changes to the exemption scope or applicability are advised. The EU Commission will consider these recommendations as they prepare official decisions on the renewals of these critical exemptions.

As noted in Article 5(6) of EU RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU, if the EU Commission declines to renew any of the exemptions under review, the exemption will remain valid for 12-18 months after the final decision is published in the EU Official Journal.

Stakeholders are invited to participate in a stakeholder consultation process for both projects, which interested parties can register for online. More information about both projects can be found here.

GreenSoft keeps track of EU RoHS exemptions for you

GreenSoft maintains a compiled list of the EU RoHS Exemptions in order to perform EU RoHS Data Services for our customers and to keep our GreenData Manager software up-to-date. We also make this list available online to the public for your convenience and reference.

Updates and exemptions to regulations occur regularly. With the status and timing of exemption extensions unknown, keeping track of the various dates and exemptions is a time-consuming task.

Affected companies using parts or materials that utilize expiring exemptions that were not extended should immediately begin finding replacements and phasing out the use of those parts or materials.

GreenSoft can help with this process, including the sourcing of replacement parts. We can help you collect the substance data on your parts and format the data to meet the due diligence and documentation requirements of EU RoHS and EN 50581.

Learn more about our EU RoHS Data Services or contact us today to get started.

Related Posts

EU RoHS Exemptions Timeline Update

EU RoHS Exemptions Updates: European Commission announces target adoption dates expected in third quarter 2024 for critical EU RoHS exemptions for electronics manufacturers

California Proposition 65

January 26, 2021 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

California Proposes New Changes to Prop 65 Warning Labels

New Proposal Issued By OEHHA To Restrict The Use Of Short-Form CA Prop 65 Warning Labels

prop-65On January 8, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) issued a proposal to amend sections of Article 6, Clear and Reasonable Warnings, of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65).

Article 6 of Proposition 65 requires affected companies to adopt safe harbor warning methods for consumer product exposures, and includes provisions for a short-form warning label, which allows manufacturers to omit the name of the chemicals known to cause cancer and/or reproductive toxicity from the warning as shown below.

 

prop-65-label
An example of the CA Prop 65 Clear and Reasonable Warning label before and after the August 2018 amendments.

However, due to widespread use of the short-form warning labels in ways that were not intended by the regulation, OEHHA has determined that further amendment of Article 6 is necessary.

The proposed changes would allow short-form warning labels to be used only if:

  1. The total surface area of the product label available for consumer information is 5 square inches or less, and;
  2. The package shape or size cannot accommodate the full-length warning described in Section 25603(a), and;
  3. The entire warning is printed in a type size no smaller than the largest type size used for other consumer information on the product. In no case shall the warning appear in a type size smaller than 6-point type.
  4. The short form warning contains the name of one or more chemicals known to cause cancer and/or reproductive toxicity. (This information will no longer be allowed to be omitted from the product Prop 65 warning.)

If approved, the changes will take affect one year from the approval date. OEHHA is currently accepting comments from the public on the proposed changes until March 8.

Public comments can be submitted here. A detailed description of the proposal can be found here.

GreenSoft Collects Chemical Information for CA Prop 65 Compliance for You

As part of our California Proposition 65 Data Services, we will collect substance data from your suppliers on your behalf, and check it against the list of chemicals regulated under CA Prop 65 using our GreenData Manager compliance software.

This will provide you with the data you need to comply with California Proposition 65 warning label requirements, while freeing up your time to focus on making and selling your products. Contact us to learn more.

Related Posts

EU REACH

January 19, 2021 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

2 New Substances Added to EU REACH SVHC List

Two New Substances Added To The SVHC Candidate List

EU-REACHTwo substances were added to the EU REACH Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) Candidate List today, taking immediate effect. The SVHC Candidate List now contains 211 substances.

The substances were proposed in September and were considered by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) during a consultation period in which interested parties were able to submit comments.

ECHA has now formally announced the inclusion of these substances to the SVHC list. The last prior addition to the EU REACH SVHC list was in June 2020.

The two new SVHC substances are:

Name EC Number CAS Number Applications Details
bis(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethyl) ether 205-594-7 143-24-8 Used in solder flux applications, adhesive production, printing inks, paint strippers, adhesive removers and paint binders. Also used as a solvent in battery electrolytes for sealed lithium ion batteries. Link
Dioctyltin dilaurate, stannane, dioctyl-, bis(coco acyloxy) derivs., and any other stannane, dioctyl-, bis(fatty acyloxy) derivs. wherein C12 is the predominant carbon number of the fatty acyloxy moiety - - Used as a heat stabilizer in PVC plastics, as a catalyst in the production of certain plastics (including polyurethanes and certain silicones), as well as in the production of polyester resins that are used for powder coating. Link

GreenSoft can help with EU REACH compliance

The EU REACH SVHC List is typically updated twice per year, resulting in affected companies needing to re-evaluate their product compliance and possibly re-collect substance data from their suppliers.

GreenSoft helps manage this process for companies, including coverage for the EU REACH SCIP Database, by performing data collection, data validation, substance calculations and report generation as part of our EU REACH data services.

Learn more about how our EU REACH data services can help your company with EU REACH and SCIP Database compliance by contacting us.

Related Posts

Conflict Minerals

January 15, 2021 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

GreenSoft Technology Implements CAHRAs Conflict Minerals Data Collection

New CAHRAs List of High-Risk Smelters Applied for EU Conflict Minerals Services

Conflict-MineralsThe European Commission has expanded the list of regions that fall under the scope of the European Union Conflict Minerals Regulation (EU) 2017/821.

Rather than limiting the scope of the regulation to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the expanded EU Regulation is now concerned with minerals sourced from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (CAHRAs) anywhere in the world.

As per Article 2f of the regulation: “‘conflict-affected and high-risk areas’ means areas in a state of armed conflict or fragile post-conflict as well as areas witnessing weak or non-existent governance and security, such as failed states, and widespread and systematic violations of international law, including human rights abuses.” This means that CAHRAs are not limited to nation-states and also can be sub-national.

On December 17, 2020, the European Commission Directorate General for Trade (DG TRADE) published the indicative, non-exhaustive and regularly updated list of CAHRAs, which can be found here.

Effective January 1, 2021, affected companies are expected to identify, manage and report on risks involved in sourcing Tin, Tungsten, Tantalum, and Gold (3TG) in their supply chain. The regulation requires EU companies in the supply chain to ensure they obtain these minerals from responsible and conflict-free sources by avoiding the export of 3TG minerals from the regions included in the CAHRAs list.

GreenSoft Technology Helps with Conflict Minerals Compliance

GreenSoft Technology can manage conflict minerals compliance for you, including Smelter or Refiner (SOR) Validation, as part of our Conflict Minerals data services or Turnkey Service.

We have incorporated the new CAHRAs list into our existing Conflict Minerals data services or Turnkey Service processes to ensure our customers are compliant with the latest regulation requirements.

Contact us today to learn about our Conflict Minerals data services and software and we’ll provide you with a free Risk Analysis.

Related Posts

SCIP Database

January 13, 2021 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

Learn About SCIP Database Requirements

What You Need To Know About The SCIP Database Submission Process

scipThe deadline for submitting dossiers to the EU SCIP Database has arrived. Affected companies are now expected to prepare and submit SCIP dossiers on any of their products containing reportable Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) as of January 5, 2021.

The data requirements for dossier submissions are different and more complicated than previous EU REACH Article 33 requirements. SCIP dossier submissions must include information on the location of articles within the product containing reportable SVHCs; detailed article, substances and material information; and article and material classifications.

To help you get prepared, we’ve created a SCIP Database playlist with educational videos on the following topics:

Additionally, the playlist contains videos demoing our SCIP Database solutions, including:

View the videos by clicking the links above, or view the full playlist on YouTube.

GreenSoft provides a SCIP Database solution

GreenSoft has a solution for companies required to make SCIP Database submissions.

As part of our SCIP Database solution, we will collect data on reportable SVHCs from your suppliers, including article and material classifications, and all other information needed for mandatory SCIP Database requirements. We then validate that data for accuracy, and convert it into SCIP dossier format for direct submissions to the SCIP Database.

Contact us to learn more about our SCIP Database solution.

Related Posts

SCIP Database

January 5, 2021 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

SCIP Database Submissions Due Now

Submissions to the SCIP Database Are Now Due

scipThe January 5 deadline for submitting dossiers to the EU SCIP Database has arrived. Affected companies are now expected to prepare and submit SCIP dossiers on any of their products containing reportable Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs).

The data required for dossier submissions is significantly higher than previous EU REACH Article 33 requirements, and includes:

  • Which parts/articles in your products contain reportable SVHCs
  • Detailed article, substance and material information
  • Article and material classifications
  • Details on the location of articles within the product being placed on the market

EU producers/assemblers, EU importers, and EU distributors of articles and other parts in the supply chain placing articles on the EU market are all required to comply with the SCIP Database submission requirements. But even companies that are not directly required to comply will often be requested by their customers to provide the necessary data for them to submit product information to the SCIP Database.

GreenSoft provides a SCIP Database solution

GreenSoft has a solution for companies struggling to meet their SCIP Database obligations.

As part of our SCIP Database solution, we will collect data on reportable SVHCs from your suppliers, including article and material classifications, and all other information needed for mandatory SCIP Database requirements. We then validate that data for accuracy, and convert it into SCIP dossier format for submissions to the SCIP Database.

Contact us to learn more about our SCIP Database solution.

Related Posts

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

EU REACH

November 20, 2020 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

Glass and the EU REACH Regulation

European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) clarifies on the EU REACH exemption for glass

EU-REACHUnder the EU REACH regulation, manufacturers may be permitted to apply certain exemptions to substance restrictions for certain substances and applications.

Substances incorporated into ceramic or glass frit is one such application that has been exempted from the registration, downstream user and evaluation requirements of Annex V of the REACH regulation.

This month, in an email received by GreenSoft Technology from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), ECHA has clarified the EU REACH exemptions relating to glass substances and articles.

Glass as a substance is exempt from EU REACH Titles II, V and VI

The substance ‘glass’ is exempted from REACH Titles II (registration), V (downstream users) and VI (evaluation) according to entry 11 of Annex V to REACH Article 2 (7) (b). This exemption applies to glass as a substance. Note however, that glass or ceramic frits are only to be exempted from registration if they do not meet the criteria for classification as hazardous according to the CLP Regulation. Entry 11 is explained in further detail in the Guidance for Annex V, available at: https://echa.europa.eu/guidance-documents/guidance-on-reach

Lead or lead oxide is exempt only when fully encapsulated in glass matrix

The presence of lead / lead oxide in a final glass article would in principle be subject to the obligations for substances of very high concern (SVHCs) in the Candidate list, including the Article 33 communication, and SCIP notification obligations,  if the SVHC concentration is above 0.1 % (w/w), see http://echa.europa.eu/candidate-list-obligations

However, if the lead glass is a different substancewhere the argument is that the lead is bound to the glass in such a way that the resulting UVCB glass is a new substance – then the presence of that substance is not subject to the communication obligation.  This is the case, for example, of lead used in glass frit within electronic resistors, which is also exempted from EU RoHS limits under EU RoHS Annex III exemption 7(c)-i.

Note however, that if there is any unbound lead in the glass that the user can be exposed to, then that lead would need to be communicated to the recipient. For example, lead present in paint or coating applied to a glass article would not qualify as REACH exempt.

EU RoHS exemptions do not automatically apply as EU REACH exemptions

Note that the obligations related to substances in articles under REACH apply irrespective of other legislative requirements. For example, an exemption for an electronic component under the RoHS Directive does not automatically mean an exemption under REACH. Each exemption from the REACH obligations has to fulfil the criteria set out in the REACH Regulation.

GreenSoft Technology helps with EU REACH compliance

GreenSoft Technology works closely with government bodies such as ECHA to understand and analyze regulation requirements and how they pertain to our customers.

We provide EU REACH data services to help manufacturers ensure that the products they place on the EU market are compliant with REACH obligations.

GreenSoft Technology can manage your entire compliance process, including coverage for the EU REACH SCIP Database, by performing data collection, data validation, substance calculations and report generation as part of our EU REACH data services.

Learn more about our EU REACH data services by contacting us.

 

Related Posts

 

EU RoHS

October 26, 2020 | Written by GreenSoft Technology, Inc.

Electronic Device Removed from Market Due to EU RoHS & EU POPs Violation

EU RoHS and EU POPs Violation For Electronic Device

eu-rohsA Melissa brand countertop popcorn maker has been removed from the European market for failure to comply with the EU RoHS Directive and the EU Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Regulation.

The European Commission ordered the enforcement action to remove the product from the EU market after an alert was submitted by Sweden. The product was manufactured in China and imported into the EU by Adexi.

Per the enforcement action notice, the plastic "feet" on the popcorn maker contain an excessive amount of lead (measured value up to 0.17-0.2% by weight), and the cable insulation contains an excessive amount of short chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) (measured value up to 0.562-0.580% by weight), thereby putting the product in violation of the EU RoHS Directive and the EU POPs Regulation.

As a result of the violation, the manufacturer and EU distributors were forced to withdraw the product from the market.

A notice of the enforcement action can be found here.

 

GreenSoft’s data services can help prevent loss of market access for regulation violations

Compliance with the EU RoHS Directive and the EU POPs Regulation are requirements for affected companies that manufacture or distribute products in the European market. As demonstrated by the enforcement action above, failure to comply with EU RoHS or EU POPs can result of loss of market access and other serious consequences for manufacturers and distributors.

GreenSoft provides Data Services to help your company comply with the EU RoHS Directive and the EU POPs Regulation so that you can ensure you retain market access to the European market.

We will collect compliance data on parts and assemblies from your supply chain for you, and generate compliance and completion reports so that you can assess whether your products and parts are in compliance with EU RoHS or EU POPs and other regulations. For parts that are above the regulation thresholds, we can help in the sourcing of replacement parts.

Learn more about our Data Services or contact us today to get started.

Related Posts

EU RoHS Exemptions Timeline Update

EU RoHS Exemptions Updates: European Commission announces target adoption dates expected in third quarter 2024 for critical EU RoHS exemptions for electronics manufacturers